| Dear Representative Hutchinson;
This will be the last letter you will
receive on the subject of cancer, viral, bacterial and vascular diseases. I, have listed
all the diseases as I currently have Patents on the Cancer, Viral and Bacterial diseases,
and; my Application for Claims concerning Vascular Diseases has been accepted by the
Patent Office for processing. Further information on my discoveries will be on my personal
Web Page Conversations with Col Joe. This letter is sent, as a courtesy, as
you and certain other members of congress will be featured on the page.
I will no longer try to work within the
system: And I have sufficient evidence to counter any criticism that I failed
to do so. I like most Americans am now convinced that everything possible has and will be
done to prevent a cure for cancer being made known. Thank God for the Web
Again, I am sending you data which
shows smoking does not cause cancer;
making the trial against the tobacco
industry the largest scam in the history of America carried out by trial lawyers. You are
a trial lawyer, as is Lindsey Graham who also has received information from me. Following
discussion of 2 sheets from one scientific study used to determine smoking may be
hazardous to health, I, will explain how that became smoking causes
cancer.. Of the 2 pages stapled together, study page marked 345 in the upper right
corner, paying attention to the Skin and Tumor of Lung and the Leukemia
and Mammary Gl Ca numbers (yellow hi-lite); this data is critical to the
teaching that smoking caused cancer: Now study the page marked 346, in the
upper left corner, paying attention to the Skin and Tumor of Lung and
Leukemia and Mammary Gl Ca numbers (green hi-lite). It should not be necessary
to point out to you the differences or what the data teaches. I will to be sure you
understand what the data teaches
First; there are 150 mice total in
Groups A and B; in which a combination of beta radiation and tar (cigarette)
was used; mice in these Groups had totals of 87 mice with Skin Cancer and 85 mice with
Tumor of Lung . There are 149 mice total in Groups D and E in which only beta radiation
was used.; mice in these Groups had totals of 9 mice with Skin Cancer and 95
mice with Tumor of Lung. It is clear what caused Tumor of Lung in all Groups.
And with knowledge that radiation
decomposed oxalic acid in the blood of all Groups; would there been as many mice with skin
cancer without radiation??
Also notice the difference in Leukemia
and Mammary Gl. Ca numbers of cancer.. What that teaches me is that cancer starts in the
weakest part of the body first. For certain the way they prepared the skin in Groups A and
B; Skin Cancer would develop first and then Tumor of Lung next. And total number of Tumor
of Lung in Groups A&B85, and total number of Tumor of Lung in Groups
D&E97.
There were 2 other Groups; one with 49
mice received only tar, and one with 44 mice (the control Group) received only acetone.
These groups had the same types, but lower numbers of cancer than Groups A and B, and/or,
D and E; except for Skin Cancer. I, want to emphasize this data was reported in the
JOURNAL of the AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY Volume 14, 1961. and the study was funded by the
Society and the National Institutes of Health.
There was an earlier study, 1959 which
data showed that tar did produce skin cancers, and data that X irradiation apparently
acted as a systemic initiating agent of carcinogenesis.
This study was in the Journal of the
National Cancer Institute, Vol. 22, 1959; and these two studies caused the initial warning
that smoking may be hazardous to health
The third study to consider was a study
of Mortality of Uranium Miners in Relation to Radiation Exposure, Hard-Rock Mining and
Cigarette Smoking1950 through September 1967,
First presented June 1968. The basic
data showed miners who smoked had 10 times more lung cancer than did non-smoking miners.
There was no data showing the exact levels of radiation each were exposed to, or any data
concerning diet or other environmental factors. It does teach however that radiation is a
cause of cancer. I believe the results were influenced by a desire to show that smoking
was bad and by a desire to protect scientists reputation by not admitting ignorance of the
effects of radiation. Following presentation of this data, C. Everett Koop the Surgeon
General established the government position that smoking caused cancer. There
is no scientific data to support that conclusion in view of data published in 1968 that
radiation decomposes OXALIC ACID, a normal element in human blood. My research teaches
that oxalic acid prevents cancers from developing in human blood and/or reduces tumors.
The next item; I believe is an effort by
the government to further delay the discovery of a treatment for and prevention of cancer
by a natural method; and exposing a simple inexpensive composition that can be used as a
chemotherapy for emergency treatment of cancer. I am referring to the article about the
award of $2.5 million to study food items. (enclosed) This is an absolute waste of
taxpayer monies. All of this has already been accomplished. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture has identified all of the Nutrients in the items mentioned in the first
paragraph of the article. I have enclosed page 385 of Handbook 8-11 published by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture which shows the Nutrients in spinach and oxalic
acid is shown on a separate page. The Specification in my Patent contains the oxalic level
in red grapes and blueberries. Watermelon and rice contain NO oxalic acid and would
have no effect on cancer, heart or any other disease.
I have written Dr. John White,
Chancellor, University of Arkansas and included copies of the same page on spinach and a
Notice Of Allowance of my Claims. The effort will only validate what I have discovered and
will waste $2.5 million and contribute to the death and suffering of millions of citizens
by delaying the recognition & acceptance of my discovery. This letter will be on my
web page, as will a list of people I have contacted, including
Members of Congress, government
agencies, news media, including TV personalities, and various companies. Of course I will
point out that the Republican Party and Republican Members Of Congress receive generous
contributions from the pharmaceutical companies and doctors, receiving many more dollars
than Democrats.
What I have discussed in this letter is
only a small part of the evidence that I will show on my page to convince the American
citizens that there has been a cover up of this data dating back to 1945. I will have it
on my Web page as soon as possible to expose as much as possible before the elections this
November.
Respectfully,
Francis J. Hart





To Return To Special Items, Click Here
Back to Index, Click
Here.
|